Reinventing Our Icons
“Have you seen the Dockers ads?” someone asked me recently at a conference, after I told them I write about masculinity. "A friend told me he liked those ads, because he is so unsure of what it means to 'be a man' right now. Everything has changed. There are no icons pointing men where to go, what to be like."
I hear this frequently, and I have asked myself this often, too, in my own personal identity development process of coming to a female masculinity as butch. Where are the feminist men? Where are the radical depictions of masculinity? Where are the examples of health and strength and skill and honor that I can admire and emulate? Who can I look to? Who will be a mirror showing me my reflection so that I can push myself in the direction that best fits me? I speak to this when I talk about depictions of healthy relationships in the media, too—where are they? What does that look like? Where are the heterosexual couples with men treating women with respect, value, care? Where is the equality? Where are the conscientious, thoughtful dads?
Things are changing. That is my entire premise of this series of articles on Radical Masculinity: that we are at a precarious time, in transition, finally studying what it means to "be a man" in this culture, much like feminists and gender scholars have been studying femininity and women in the past forty years. Underneath the question of what it means to "be a man," as queers and butches and trans and genderqueer folks are also asking, is what it means to be masculine. The concepts of masculinity have changed, and is still changing, and while there is no singular meaning (like perhaps the fictional version of the nuclear family and breadwinner in the 1950s), I'm finding that there is no shortage of masculine icons.
I've always been a sucker for archetypes, which the most vivid icons do become. John Wayne, Humphrey Bogart, James Dean, Elvis Presley. Even more so than icons, the archetypes of masculinity tell us so much about what the culture deems valuable, as archetypes are the "original model of a person, ideal example, or a prototype upon which others are copied, patterned, or emulated; a symbol universally recognized by all." So who becomes an archetype, and why? Who are the archetypes of masculinity?
I began gathering names of icons of masculinity from friends, acquaintances, community members, readers. I posed the question on Sugarbutch Chronicles, I asked about it on Twitter (also known as "the hive mind," it is tremendously interesting to poll there), I posted photographs and quotes on Tumblr, and kept a document of the results. Most of the mentioned icons, many of whom became archetypes, were cisgender (meaning not transgender) men. Personally, coming to my own in queer communities, many of my icons were my peers, as it is rare to see female masculinity, transgender, or genderqueer depictions reflected in the larger culture. But perhaps icons who have permeated the collective unconscious to the point of being an archetype are by necessity older than one's own peer group, and need to be not only icons to us but also to our parents or caretakers so that they become embedded in our childhood learnings of what represented adult roles and mature gender.
And since the concept of gender and biological sex being separate is a relatively young one, beginning to show up in discourse in the 1950s, before the social change movements of the 1960s, the icons most frequently cited were predominantly white cisgender American men. If, as I would argue, icons come up and out of not just the collective subconscious but also a reflection of the ideologies of the times, it makes sense to idealize and iconize those who also fit the cultural restrictions of what In my limited, personal observation on these subjects, I believe it has been shifting in the recent forty or so years, and more men of color, genderqueer, and transgender folks are becoming iconic role models. It's still a problem that many of the "traditional" icons of masculinity are white cisgender American men, yes. That's a problem. So let's change that, as we go forward—let's please have more icons of masculinity who are men of color—positive icons, not the "bad guy" icons. Let's have more genderqueer and butch dyke role models. Here's hoping currently influential folks like Jay-Z and Rachel Maddow will continue to evolve into icons.

Comment
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo











Comments
Why?
I have to say that I think this is where a lot of people go wrong. Why should we even be concerned with what a "real man" is if we're truly just trying to be who we are on the inside?
We say that we were born to be who we are; that regardless of our anatomies we were meant to be this way. If that's true, then why do we need to try to emulate anyone else? If you feel "masculine" then just be masculine in whatever form that takes naturally. If it's femine, same thing. If you like to wear certain clothes then wear them. If it makes you feel good to be chivalrous then do it. Walk and talk the way that comes naturally.
When we are honest with ourselves and those around us about who we really are is when we're most happy. I believe the most miserable human being is one who is trying to be someone they weren't meant to be.
semiotics
benglett - I think you make some valid points and raise some interesting questions. Still, everybody wears some sort of clothes (at least in public), has their haircut to some style, walks, talks, etc. a particular way. As Sinclair put it, "gender is something that happens at the edges of the body, where the body interacts with the world, putting out cues and signals non-verbally as to who we are". Like it or not, the how we present ourselves inevitably acts as a form of communication, so the question becomes, "what am I saying when I do _________?"
I think it's possible to be aware — and even deliberate — about the cues we give off and their meaning in various contexts, without trying to be someone else. When we understand what the signs and signals mean, we can use them, whether with sincerity or irony or humor or whatever, to make most effectively whatever sort of statement we choose to make.
man overboard
Currently the man is represented by all destruction and no construction due to the logic of war where all the bucks run off the President's back and come to us as bill to pay. manliness is PTSD...
Icons and Archetypes
Icons are far different than archetypes, I believe. Icons are those symbols that we project onto others. Archetypes come from deep within the psyche. The icons of Elvis Presley, Cary Grant, John Wayne and so forth were never my image of the masculine man. Indeed, I more often than not rebeled against their dominance and stereotypical postures. Well, Cary Grant may be an exception.
The old achetypes, used by such organizations as The Mankind Project et al, of Warrior, King, Lover, and Magician no longer work for me either. In my youth they did because they were easily tapped into and embodied because I was seeking to assert myself and fit in. I prefer those of The Green Man (Cernnunos), Shaman, Eros, and Thanatos these days. Then again, I'm not in mid-life anymore but have entered elderhood. So, it makes sense to me that I would embrace archetypes that meet my stage in life.
Even that stated, "The Green Man" is one that can be embraced at any age. It is the power of nature, the nurturing of all that lives, the seeding of the field as well as the forest, the vibrancy of living to the fullest with all of my potential. The Green Man energy is full of compassion and destruction, the tearing down as nature gives birth and the building up as nature thrusts forward. If parenting involved nurturing the child to fulfill the gifts they have, then the power of The Green Man is being called upon. If parenting is dominating the child to follow in the footsteps of the authority figure, then it is an off-balance approach that is destructive to the child, limiting and inhibiting. In my perpsective we are in need of The Green Man energy in our society and world.
It takes, however, mindfullness to live in the Shaman, The Green Man, Eros as well as Thanatos, knowing that we are a part of the greater whole.