Have We Reached the Edge of Edgy?

 

It gets harder and harder to shock me anymore, especially with things involving extreme sexuality, fetish wear, cross dressing, and artistic expression of an alternative nature. I've been to every Folsom Street Fair since it started, and I have been documenting it with photographs for the past several years. This year's Folsom Street Fair was pleasantly warm and sunny, with just a hint of crisp sunlight that you only get in the fall—perfect for photos. The fact that the temperatures dropped so suddenly the very next day once again proves that god loves the Folsom Street Fair!

I don't purposely seek out the freaks, but I try not to miss a Diane Arbus moment, either.

When I go out to shoot photos at events like the Folsom Street Fair, my intention is to search out the most beautiful men wearing the least amount of clothes. In most cases, the people who are the most naked are usually the ones who should put on more clothes. My customers are more likely to pay to see hot guys with their pants on over senior citizens with nothing on. I don't purposely seek out the freaks, but I try not to miss a Diane Arbus moment, either.

Men in drag? Been there, done that. Public flogging? Ho hum. Self-abuse with tattoos and multiple piercings? So 90s. Spent a whole paycheck on leather "gear" at Mr. S you'll only wear once? Wasteful consumerism. Putting together an anti-fashion statement? Fun, but it probably won't get you laid.

That pretty much sums up the extent of the edgy, alternative lifestyles represented at leather fairs like Folsom. If you put a pasty, middle-aged accountant in a harness and chaps, he's still a pasty, middle-aged accountant. I search out the men who are so perfectly handsome, virile, muscular, and well endowed that such good looks could only be due to genetic mutation. Freakishly beautiful rather than merely freakish. That's why porn stars are born, not made.

Despite my jadedness, I did visit a booth at Folsom Street Fair displaying products that would surely put the Christians into a talking-in-tongues tizzy. I gotta say, I've never seen this before and I don't quite know what to think about it. The booth was for a company called "Fetish Tots," which makes custom leather fetish gear for kids. Their slogan is "Kinky couture for little people." They had some little-kid-sized mannequins in baby blue and girly pink leather hoods, gas masks, and, of course, pacifier ball gags. (Well, if you think about it, a ball gag and a pacifier are basically the same thing, right? Whatever it takes to shut 'em up!)

I asked one of the guys in the booth, "So, who buys this stuff?"

"Nobody yet. It's just prototypes, and we haven't put them up for sale yet."

"What market are you aiming at?"

"Oh, we just make it and sell it. We don't really care what people do with it after they buy it."

I was afraid of that. I told some friends about Fetish Tots, and they seem to think it's some sort of artistic statement, not a real business. Even if this particular group is just making a statement, some slimeballs will take the idea and actually sell it to people.

Parents of small children are the most gullible of all consumers. There are so many yuppies in this town carrying designer babies as accessories just so they have an excuse to consume more overpriced stuff. Just a few short years ago, all my Burning Man friends were wearing fetish gear and having lots of kinky sex, and guess what? They all have kids now, and they're dying to dress up the little Baby Burners just like Mommy and Daddy!

I am going to pose this question to test your true lefty liberal backbone: If a parent dresses a toddler in fetish wear, is it consensual? Discuss.

 

More Folsom Street Fair Photos in the LAVENDER LOUNGE VIP ROOM.

 

Comments


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Wait a minute...

That's a tricky question...

Basically, I don't think that ANYTHING you make your toddler wear is consensual, but that's besides the point. Fetishes are primarily sexual and any attempt at sexualizing a tiny little kid is just plain wrong. I mean, if you're talking about dressing up your kid in just plain ol' funky outfits, whatever, dress your kid up like you want, but as for anything sexual well that's fucked up.

You're neglecting to factor

You're neglecting to factor in any desire of the child here.

Say a child sees this clothing and wants it? To them it's nothing more then interesting wear.
Where's the problem?

Unless the child, by wearing the clothing is obliged to fulfil the sexual role the clothing initially originated, there's no harm - except from those who sexualise the child in their own mind. And if that's your concern, there's plenty of already widely available children's clothing that should equally come under your radar.

WTF

Kids aren't accessories. It is the job of the parents to make sure their child reaches maturity and can fend for themselves. This includes making sure they don't get picked off by predators. Putting a child in sexualized clothing is not only non-consenual, it borders psychotic. You might as well hang your son or daughter out a window beeping your horn screeming "Predators, look at my kids!". I'm as left as they come, but come on people, these are toddlers. Sickening. This booth should have been run out of town, not by some religious group, but, by parents. There is such a thing as right and wrong.

Most garments children wear

Most garments children wear are perhaps non-consensual. Are you against all non-consensual clothing of children, or are you somehow managing to construe this particular wear as being somehow different?

With exceptions to young children who have unfortunately encountered adult sexuality, there is NOTHING sexual about this wear to the children. Any sexualisation comes only from you. And that is something you should personally address. Not a clothing manufacturer.

What the hell? I see the

What the hell? I see the photo of the mannequin and all I can think is, the only person who would buy this is a pedophile who wants to engage in fetish-flavored child rape. I can't honestly see any parent buying this for their children, except maybe the most unhinged, who may fall into the fetish-pedo category anyway. The line about "We don't really care what people do with it after they buy it." is deeply, intensely disturbing; it gives rise to a visceral and nauseating gut reaction of they know exactly who they're selling to, and they're ok with that. Ugh. Ugh ugh ugh. Not enough ugh in the world. I can't see how this sort of business is legal in any way, shape or form - surely there is something they could be reported for?

bullsh*t

Omg whoever made this is seriously going to hell for basically promoting child molestation. What goes around comes around and a person that would endorse and aid in that evil and sadistic an act will not go unpunished.

What?! How is this, by any

What?! How is this, by any stretch of the imagination, promoting child abuse?

By that logic, toy companies manufacturing cheap cowboy and indian toys are promoting genocide and imperialism.

Fair enough if you personally

Fair enough if you personally have paedophilic thoughts on seeing these photographs, though I don't think you should tar everyone as having similar sentiments.

I see them as curious outfits. Nothing intrinsically untoward. If the child thinks they look good, let them have wear it. No worse then ridiculous home-made spiderman costumes.

Clothing as derived from an adult sexual nature doesn't necessitate its initial purpose to transfer to the descendants, just as widespread clothing as derived from military uniforms doesn't necessitate wearers are supportive of government sanctioned homicide.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Mark Kliem
September 30th, 2009
Mark Kliem's picture

Mark Kliem has been in the adult business full time since 1996. He has directed 8 feature-length movies for Brush Creek Media and freelanced for Titan Media, Le Salon, Hot House, Falcon, All Worlds, P.R, Simon, and Chi Chi LaRue. He helped launch Naked Sword and Gay Porn Blog and served as a judge of the GayVN Awards since 2001. He has been running his own company, Lavender Lounge Studios, full time since 2003. He is working on a long-term project of re-releasing “lost” 8mm gay porn movies on DVD. His other sites, which are not safe for work, include LavenderLounge.com, the award-winning Lavender Lounge Blog, GayVideoCafe.com, and ReelGuys.org